投資哲學


萬法歸一 ,股海唯心至上,到頭來無一法可得,亦無甚麽可失

投機、投資、或中短線交易,只要方法得當,則殊途同歸,並無對錯之分

投資的最高境界並非贏大錢,而是克服心魔


星期日, 10月 05, 2008

TED搞的鬼

簡單一點說,「TED Spread (Treasury & EuroDollar Spread)」是指金融市場需要的「Risk Premium」,如下:

TED Spread = LIBOR - 3-Month US T-Bill Yield


在金融風暴下,近日「TED Spread」由8月份的1%大升至10月3日的3.87%,這亦暗示銀行之間的同業拆息(Inter-bank Rate)由3%p.a.大升至5.87%p.a.(如下)。

(http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/cbuilder?ticker1=.TEDSP%3AIND)


存款基數不強健或自由現金流不強的金融機構自然麻煩,但其實同時亦影響一些現金流穩定、以及08及09年有很高機會維持07年股息的高息股(如下)。不少優質的收息股近一兩個星期突然被人大量沽售,即使本港經濟放緩亦不太像會嚴重地影響她們的來年的股息(或許恆生銀行仍有本身的風險):

電盈(8)
恆生(11)
希慎(14)
太古A(19)
利豐(494)
TVB (511)
領匯(823)


若然要拆局,「TED Spread」大升可能是主要原因。正當「Money Market」可以達6%p.a.的回報下,機構投資者可能要求收息股須要給予較高的股息率(Dividend Yield)。

然而,低利息是未來數年環球的趨勢,而正當金融市場的不明朗因素減弱後(TED Spread下降至1%至2%左右),市場可能會重新垂青這些穩健的收息股。

但為何匯控(5)、維他奶(345)以及宏利(945)等收息股的股價仍然穩定? 原因十分簡單,這類股票要不主要於歐美市場內交易,便是本身的股息率已經很高。

7 則留言:

聰聰 說...

美國救市方案通過後,TED Spread仍然高企,看來各國央行只好聯手減息!

聰聰
http://sclastro_super.mysinablog.com

Kai 說...

100% agree, some names are becoming interesting, but I won't put L&F in the same category as their business model (of acquisition) is capital-hungry. Thanks for the blog is enlightening.

阿爾伯特 說...

Do u really think Li & Fung is in lack of Capital, and has low organic growth without M&A??

You may be advised to conduct deeper research on its business model, cash flow and its industry.

LL 說...

請問知不知道中國人壽有沒有持有有毒債券?有多少?

Kai 說...

Well u might be right and I respect ur opinion.

Just a quick note, as at H108, L&F has HK$1.5bn cash, HK$1.4bn st-bank loan/OD & HK$5.8bn long term liabilities (3.8bn were notes), with equity of HK$9.7bn, so net gearing (c58%) not threatening but also not low.

Company hist. trades at high PE as L&F's record of M&A/organic growth has always exceeded market expectation (and its own 3-yrs plan guidance). Nevertheless, L&F might find it harder to raise gearing further in current climate also market might worry about sh-term CP rollover risk (post GE) which could limit upside.

Finally I am wary of their "organic growth", as company operates in black box style and most sell-side analysts based their organic growth assumptions for the softgoods, hardgoods etc on company guidance despite mounting evidence of a more severe recession ahead.

Nevertheless LF now trades on c18x fwd PE and maybe is attractive enough for this class name. Look fwd to hear from u on this.

J 說...

你的BLOG叫"分析員的告白"

請問你的職業真的是分析員嗎?

阿爾伯特 說...

kai:

You may have forgotten the share placement to Temasek few weeks ago :)


Jonathan:
大可以從小弟的思路和寫作手法,估下是真還是假 ^_~


II:
中人壽看似安全!